Supply Chain Action Points
Read this first — the conclusion, and the moves to make:
- Divide every canal surcharge before you accept it: get the per-transit fee and the boxes the ship actually carries after the draft limit, and set your own cost per TEU from those two figures.
- Fix drayage for at least 60% of your August and September volume on a contracted rate this week, since the local drayage pool has no substitute and reprices fastest.
- Hold any Canadian rail reroute decision for two weeks and price it as a round trip, including the U.S. gateway drayage spike you would inherit, before moving volume south.
- Set a truckload contract re-pricing trigger for 1 October instead of locking twelve months at August spot, so a September volume normalization does not leave you on a peak-priced contract.
- Track weekly port throughput and the Panama Canal draft bulletins as your two leading indicators, and re-plan the inland leg within a week whenever either of them moves.
US spot truckload and drayage rates are set to rise through August as record July import volumes clear terminals and move inland, with tight truck capacity, driver shortages and elevated fuel costs compounding pressure. Wildfires continue to disrupt Canadian rail routings, while carriers add Panama Canal transit surcharges after new draft limits cut roughly 2,000 TEU per transit.
The Analysis
U.S. spot truckload and drayage rates are set to keep climbing through August as record July import volumes clear the terminals and move inland, with tight truck capacity, driver shortages and elevated fuel costs compounding the pressure. Wildfires are still disrupting Canadian rail routings, and carriers are adding Panama Canal transit surcharges after new draft limits cut roughly 2,000 TEU per transit.
I have watched an import wave hit a drayage market more than once, and the pattern never changes. The vessel schedule gets the attention, the terminal gets the blame, and the invoice lands in the trucking line.
If your containers are discharging now or in the next four weeks, every decision that matters this month is inland, and one of those three cost items is much bigger than the other two.
Start with the shape of the problem. A record July import month is not something that happened in July; it is a decision made in May and June that arrived as boxes in July. Those boxes now have to cross a gangway into a trucking market that never rebuilt itself after the freight recession. Capacity is thin, drivers are short, fuel is expensive, and the carriers that survived two hard years are not going to discount into a surge. When you add the Canadian wildfire reroutes pushing volume onto U.S. gateways and the Panama draft limits cutting about 2,000 TEU off every transit, you have three separate pressures converging on one inland network in a single month.
Why this hits drayage before anything else is a matter of geography. A drayage market is local. You cannot swap a drayman at one port for one at another port three days away, so when that local pool is short, there is no substitute and no relief valve. That is why the spot drayage number moves within days of a terminal filling up, while inland truckload takes two to four weeks to tighten as the freight reaches the distribution centers and the outbound market stiffens in sympathy. Contract renewals follow thirty to sixty days behind the spot market, which means the importer who waits to see it in a contract pays for it twice.
Who feels what. If you buy drayage on spot, you are first in line and you have the least room to manoeuvre. If you have contract drayage with a committed pool, you are largely insulated this month and you should be using that advantage. Inland truckload exposure sits with anyone running direct-to-DC flows, and it worsens at renewal. Bulky and oversize importers are hit hardest because they cannot consolidate and they need the scarce long-haul equipment. And anyone who abandoned a Canadian rail routing because of the fires and moved volume to a U.S. West Coast gateway has walked straight into the drayage spike while still paying the canal surcharge on the way in.
The overlooked part is arithmetic, and it is the reason I never accept a transit surcharge without dividing it. The Panama surcharge is charged per transit, not per TEU, while the draft limit removes about 2,000 TEU of capacity from each transit. That means the same fixed charge is spread over fewer boxes, and the cost per box rises faster than the headline suggests. Ask for both numbers, the per-transit fee and the box count the ship actually carries after the limit, and do the division yourself. The second overlooked thing is that these are not one problem. The canal limit is a regulatory capacity cut with a published basis. The Canadian wildfire reroute is a variable disruption with no schedule. The drayage move is a local market with no substitute. They behave differently, they unwind differently, and treating them as one blended number is how people hedge the cheap one and eat the expensive one.
Run the number with the assumptions on the table. Say you bring in 40 FEU a month through a U.S. West Coast port, your average drayage runs 650 dollars a box, and it rises 15% through August. That is about 98 dollars more a box, or 3,900 dollars a month, which is roughly 46,800 dollars a year if it sticks at that level. Now the canal. Assume a transit fee of 400,000 dollars on a ship that normally carries 14,000 TEU and now carries 12,000 after the draft limit. That is 33.3 dollars a TEU against 28.6, about five dollars more per TEU, and 40 FEU at two TEU each is 80 TEU, so roughly 400 dollars a month. The headline surcharge is noise for a shipper your size. The drayage move is the money. Divide every surcharge you are handed before you accept it and you will find the same thing most months.
What would flip this. If import volumes normalize in September, truckload spot deflates quickly, because spot capacity in a loosening market gives back gains fast, and any capacity you locked at August prices becomes an overpriced contract you have to live with. If volumes hold or the canal draft limits tighten again, both the drayage level and the surcharge stick, and the September discount never arrives. Watch weekly port throughput and the canal draft bulletins as your two leading indicators, and re-plan the inland leg whenever either moves. The trap I see most is lumping all three of these costs into one line and then negotiating against the wrong one. Fix the drayage first, do the canal division yourself, and treat the wildfire reroute as a rolling decision you revisit every fortnight rather than a one-time move.
↑ Back to the key points