Drewry WCI dips 2% to $4,547 as ten-week rally pauses

The Analysis

Two percent down. That is the whole move. Drewry's World Container Index composite closed the 16 July assessment at 4,547 dollars per 40ft, off 2 percent on the week, and that was enough to stop a ten-week run of gains. Shanghai to Los Angeles came off 3 percent to 6,272 dollars. Shanghai to New York did not move at all: 7,879 dollars, flat. Nine blank sailings are booked on the transpacific for next week. And the number I keep coming back to is the one that did not happen: carriers had 7,900 to 8,500 dollars of FAK on the board for this month, and the market never paid it.

Read that last bit again, because it is the most useful thing in the release. The plan was 7,900 to 8,500. The strongest lane in the index printed 7,879 dollars, which is 21 dollars under the floor of the plan. Los Angeles printed 6,272, which is 1,628 dollars under it. A published FAK range is an ask. It is not a price, and this week it was not close to one. When a carrier tells you what it intends to charge and the index tells you what it actually got, you are looking at the gap where your negotiation lives.

So here is what I am going to do with this. I am going to turn that gap into a number you can act on, put a few lines on the chart that tell you when to lock and when to let it float, and hang a date off each one. Ten weeks of gains ending on a 2 percent down week is not a verdict. It is one print, and one print is worth exactly as much as the week it came from.

Start with the arithmetic, because the release gives you five numbers and all five are load-bearing. The composite is 4,547 dollars per 40ft, down 2 percent. Run that backwards and last week's print was about 4,640: 4,547 divided by 0.98 is 4,639.8, and I am rounding to 4,640 because the nine dollars does not change a decision. Shanghai to Los Angeles is 6,272, down 3 percent, and the same trick puts last week at 6,466. Shanghai to New York is 7,879 and flat, which means last week was 7,879 too. Nothing else in the release moves. Five numbers, and I would rather work five numbers hard than invent a sixth.

Now put them side by side. Los Angeles sits 1,725 dollars above the composite, or 37.9 percent above it. New York sits 3,332 dollars above the composite, or 73.3 percent above it. If you buy space on the transpacific and you quote a customer off the headline reading, you are quoting a number that is 1,725 dollars a box light on the west coast and 3,332 dollars a box light on the east coast. On a 40-box week that is 69,000 dollars on Los Angeles and 133,280 dollars on New York, and it is wrong in the same direction every single week. The composite is a thermometer. Your lane is the patient. I keep repeating that because the gap is not small enough to ignore.

The number I want to sit with is the one that did not happen. Carriers went into the month with FAK filings of 7,900 to 8,500 dollars. That band is 600 dollars wide, which is 7.6 percent from floor to top, and a band that wide is a negotiation printed in the shape of a tariff. Midpoint is 8,200. Shanghai to New York, the strongest lane in the index, printed 7,879. That is 21 dollars below the floor of the band and 321 dollars below the midpoint. Shanghai to Los Angeles printed 6,272, which is 1,628 dollars below the floor and 1,928 dollars below the midpoint, and it means the midpoint sat 30.7 percent above what the lane actually traded at.

Say that out loud. The carriers' own plan was 30.7 percent above the print on the busiest lane in the world and 4.1 percent above the print on the lane that did not fall at all. That is not a market that failed to reach a target. That is a target that was never in reach this month, and it tells you exactly where pricing power stopped. When a plan sits 1,628 dollars above the print, the number looks wrong to me before it looks cheap. Every quote you get this week above 7,900 on Shanghai to Los Angeles is an ask. Ask them for a fixture at that number, in writing, with a booking reference. If they cannot produce one, you are being handed a plan rather than a price, and you should budget against the price.

Then there is the capacity side, and it is the part that makes the week interesting. Nine blank sailings on the transpacific next week. Nine. In a normal month that is the kind of number that puts a floor under the rate: you pull capacity, the ships that sail fill up, and spot holds or rises. It did not happen. The composite fell 2 percent with nine sailings off the board. So the demand side is doing more work than the supply side right now, and Drewry says why: front-loading is easing, and they expect rates to stabilize as it does.

That matters more than the 2 percent. If nine blanks cannot hold the print, then the fall in demand is steeper than the cut in capacity, and that is a statement about slopes rather than levels. Front-loading is borrowed volume. You pull September cargo into July, and when you stop borrowing, the volume curve does not drift down, it drops. That is the shape of the next four to six weeks if the easing continues. It cuts the other way too, and this is the part people forget: the capacity that comes out next week is capacity you would have booked against the week after. If demand turns back on before the blanks are restored, the same nine sailings that could not hold 4,547 will put a rocket under the next print. A dip on falling demand is not a plateau. It is a dip.

Let us run your numbers instead of the index. Here are my assumptions, and you should replace every one of them with your own: you move 40 FEU a week on Shanghai to Los Angeles; you are planning the next ten weeks; the lane reads 6,272 today and read 6,466 last week; and you have nothing fixed. That is 400 boxes. At today's print the ten-week freight bill is 400 times 6,272, which is 2,508,800 dollars. At the FAK midpoint of 8,200 it would have been 3,280,000. The difference is 771,200 dollars across one quarter, on one lane, at 40 boxes a week. That is what the gap between the plan and the print is worth, and it is the biggest number in this release.

Now the lock decision. Assume a carrier offers you 6,400 fixed for the ten weeks. That is 128 dollars over today's print, or 2.0 percent, and it is 66 dollars under last week's 6,466, so you are being asked to pay a small premium for a rate that was already the market seven days ago. Fix everything at 6,400 and the bill is 2,560,000, which is 51,200 above staying at today's print. Run two cases around it. Soft case, the lane averages 6,000 over the ten weeks: floating costs 2,400,000 and the full fix costs you an extra 160,000. Hard case, it averages 7,000: floating costs 2,800,000 and the fix saves you 240,000. A full fix is a 160,000-dollar premium against a 240,000-dollar exposure.

Half-and-half is the version I would take. Fix 200 boxes at 6,400 and float 200. Soft case: 1,280,000 plus 1,200,000 is 2,480,000, so you overpay 80,000 against floating everything. Hard case: 1,280,000 plus 1,400,000 is 2,680,000, so you save 120,000. You are paying at most 80,000 to take 120,000 of risk off the table, and you keep half your volume in a market that just turned down for the first time in ten weeks. If the ask is 6,600 rather than 6,400, the premium goes to 328 dollars a box and I would wait one print. If it is 6,272 or better, take 60 percent rather than 50.

One more way to see the cost of waiting, because waiting to see what next week does is not a free option. A 3 percent weekly move on Shanghai to Los Angeles is 188 dollars a box. On 40 boxes that is 7,520 dollars a week, in either direction. Wait two weeks and you have put 15,040 dollars of variance on the table without deciding anything. Set that against the 80,000-dollar worst case on the half fix over ten weeks, which is 8,000 a week of premium. Two weeks of waiting costs about the same as two weeks of insurance, except the insurance keeps paying after the two weeks are up. That is why the answer is not wait and see. The answer is wait one print with a trigger already written down.

So write the triggers down, and here are mine, every one of them derived from this release and nothing else. On the composite, 4,640 is last week. If next Thursday prints above 4,640, the pause lasted exactly one week and the rally is intact, so stop waiting and lock. On the composite, 4,400 is 3.2 percent below today. Two consecutive prints under 4,400 and I stop calling it a pullback and start calling it a turn, which means you reopen the annual tender rather than fiddle with the spot book. On Shanghai to Los Angeles, 6,466 is last week and a move back above it ends the dip.

On the same lane, 6,000 is 4.3 percent below today and is your renegotiate line: two weeks under it and you walk in with the index in your hand and ask for a cut. On the same lane, 7,000 is 11.6 percent above today and is your lock line: at or above it, fix 60 percent of the quarter within 48 hours. And 7,900 is the floor of the FAK that failed, and there is nothing in this release that says you should ever pay it.

Then look at New York, because flat is a signal. Los Angeles fell 3 percent, the composite fell 2 percent, and Shanghai to New York did not move at 7,879. One flat week is one flat week. Two flat weeks while the rest of the board slides is strength, and it is worth 1,607 dollars a box over Los Angeles right now. If that spread holds, run the routing math: New York direct at 7,879 against Los Angeles at 6,272 plus your inland move east. If your inland number is under 1,607 a box, the west coast routing wins on paper. Before you believe it, check two things: the extra transit days, and the rollover risk that comes with nine blank sailings, because a box that rolls does not save you anything. I do not have your inland rate and I am not going to invent one. Plug yours in.

Keep counting the blanks. Nine next week. If the week after comes in at five or fewer and the composite still falls, demand is genuinely soft and you can push harder on price. If the count stays near nine for three weeks and the composite flattens instead of falling, capacity alone is holding the floor, and one restocking surge takes the top off it. That is the scenario where the 7,000 lock line gets hit fast, and it is the scenario I would want a fix already sitting in place for. Counting blank sailings takes four minutes a week. It is the cheapest leading indicator on the board and almost nobody counts it.

Here is what I would put in front of the carriers this week, and I would have it out by Friday. Four questions in one email. What was your FAK filing for this month? What did you actually settle on my top lane over the last four weeks? What is your blank sailing plan for the next three weeks rather than just next week? And which lines in my contract keep floating if I fix the base? You want those answers in writing, because the gap between the first two is your negotiating position and the third tells you whether the second survives the month. If a carrier will not put the settled number in an email, that is an answer as well, and it is not the one you were hoping for.

The front-loading point settles something else for you. If you pulled cargo forward to beat a date, whatever premium you paid to do it, the market has now moved against you by 194 dollars a box on Shanghai to Los Angeles in seven days, from 6,466 to 6,272. Stop pulling. Anything that can move on its normal schedule should move on its normal schedule from here, because that trade is closed: you paid to get ahead of a rate that is now going the other way. Compare your carrying cost per box per week against the 188 dollars a week this lane is capable of moving. If carrying cost is lower, holding stock beats chasing the spot market, and you can let the rate come to you instead.

Then write the collar. A quarterly base of 6,800 on Shanghai to Los Angeles with a cap at 7,200 and a floor at 5,800, re-set monthly against the Thursday print, is the structure I would ask for. Read what it does. If the lane spikes to 7,600 in a week, you pay 7,200 and the collar saves you 400 a box, which is 16,000 dollars on a 40-box week. If it collapses to 5,500, you pay 5,800 and the floor costs you 300 a box, or 12,000 a week. You are trading 12,000 of downside for 16,000 of upside protection, and you no longer have to guess which Thursday matters. Carriers will take a collar more readily than a flat cut right now, because they are looking at the same 4,547 print you are and they know the ten-week run just ended.

Put names and dates on it, because a trigger without an owner is a wish. This Thursday, whoever runs pricing reads the print and posts three numbers on one page: composite, Los Angeles, New York. On Monday, procurement sends the four questions to the top three carriers and chases them to Friday. In the week of 27 July, whoever owns the contract opens the collar conversation, with 31 July as the internal deadline for a signed amendment. From 3 August the lock trigger is live and it sits with pricing rather than procurement, because pricing sees the Thursday print first and has 48 hours to act on it. One page, four names, four dates. That is the entire operating plan for a week like this one.

Budget it as a range rather than a point, because a single number is wrong by the second Thursday. If you take the half fix, your ten-week freight line lands somewhere between 2,480,000 and 2,680,000. The midpoint is 2,580,000, which is 258,000 a week against the 250,880 you would spend floating at today's print, so the premium for carrying the range is about 7,120 dollars a week. Hand finance that band plus the two triggers that decide which end you land on. A budget with a band and a trigger survives a rate shock. A budget with one number in it gets rewritten in week three, usually by somebody who was not in the room.

Four ways to lose money on a week like this. One, quoting off the composite when you ship a lane, which is a 1,725-dollar mistake on Los Angeles and a 3,332-dollar mistake on New York. Two, treating a FAK filing as a price, when a 600-dollar band the market never reached is an opening position. Three, signing a fixed rate that only fixes the base and leaves the surcharge schedule floating, so check which lines sit inside the fix and get it into the contract rather than the email thread. Four, ignoring the rollover. Nine blanks mean some boxes do not sail next week, and if your transit commitment has a blank-sailing carve-out, you have no claim at all when yours is one of them. Read that clause this week rather than in October.

And here is what would change my mind, stated in advance so I cannot move the goalposts later. If the composite prints above 4,640 next Thursday and Shanghai to Los Angeles goes with it, the pause was a one-week event and every wait in this piece is wrong, so lock instead. If nine blank sailings stay on the board for three straight weeks and the composite stops falling, capacity is holding the floor on its own, and the 7,000 lock line is closer than the 6,000 renegotiate line. If Shanghai to New York breaks above 7,879 while Los Angeles keeps sliding, the east coast premium is widening past 1,607 and the routing math flips. Three prints, three decisions. I do not need a forecast to tell me which one happened.

One last piece of mechanics. This index prints on Thursdays, so run your rate decisions on a Thursday-to-Thursday cycle rather than whenever somebody remembers. Read it, post three numbers on one page, check them against the four lines, and act or do not act inside 48 hours. Ten weeks of gains ended on a Thursday. The week it turns back up, if it does, will also be a Thursday, and you want to be looking at that page the morning it prints.

Ten weeks up, 2 percent down, nine sailings pulled, and the carriers' own number still 1,628 dollars above the market on the lane that actually trades. Somewhere there is a pricing deck with 8,500 dollars on the slide and a very confident footnote under it. The market read the footnote and printed 6,272. I know which number I am putting in the budget, and it is not the one with the footnote.

↑ Back to the key points

— By Vivian Zhao