Supply Chain Action Points
Read this first — the conclusion, and the moves to make:
- Re-price both transpacific routings every booking cycle while the East-West spread stays above $2,000 per FEU; include a carrying-cost line for the extra transit days, not just the freight.
- Stop negotiating off announced filing amounts; build a filing-by-filing table of announced versus realized rates on your lanes and negotiate off the realized floor.
- Diarise the filing count: if an eighteenth and nineteenth filing land within four weeks on your lane, treat it as capacity stress and convert 25 to 30% of fourth-quarter volume to contract before 15 October.
- For East Coast inland cargo, model the West Coast plus intermodal alternative at every quote; at 50 FEU a month the routing swing is worth $4,000 to $5,000.
- Assign one analyst to file the weekly spot prints for both coasts every Monday; a double-digit weekly jump that is not demand-led usually gives half of itself back within a fortnight.
Multiple carriers including CMA CGM, COSCO, Evergreen, HMM, Hapag-Lloyd, Yang Ming and ZIM filed another General Rate Increase with the U.S. FMC effective 1 September-the 17th eastbound-transpacific GRI of 2026. Asia-US East Coast spot rates hit a 2026 high of USD 9,144 per FEU (+1% WoW) and West Coast jumped 11% to USD 6,826 per FEU, sustaining elevated transpacific pricing.
The Analysis
Seven carriers filed the same general rate increase with the U.S. Federal Maritime Commission, effective 1 September: CMA CGM, COSCO, Evergreen, HMM, Hapag-Lloyd, Yang Ming and ZIM. That is the seventeenth eastbound transpacific filing of 2026. Seventeen in eight months. If you are still opening each one like news, you are reading the market wrong — the filing count is the story, and the story is about carrier pricing behavior, not about your cargo.
The spot numbers behind the filing are the loud part. Asia to U.S. East Coast hit a 2026 high of $9,144 per FEU, up 1% week on week. The West Coast jumped 11% to $6,826 per FEU. Two coasts, two speeds, and a spread between them that now decides where your box lands.
Run the routing math on that spread before anything else, because the answer changes depending on whether you count days.
Start with the two spot prints. U.S. East Coast at $9,144 per FEU is a 2026 high, up 1% on the week. The West Coast at $6,826 is up 11% on the week — the sharp move. The spread between the coasts is $2,318 per FEU. Now run the routing math, because that spread is the number that changes decisions. All-water to the East Coast at $9,144 against the West Coast at $6,826 plus intermodal rail to the same inland point: assume rail plus drayage at $2,400 per FEU, which is a working assumption, not a quote.
West Coast routing lands at $9,226 — $82 per box more than all-water. At 50 FEU a month that is about $4,100 a month, real money but not decisive. Then price the time: all-water to the East Coast typically adds ten to fourteen days of transit, and if your goods are worth $40,000 per box and capital costs 15% a year, twelve extra days is about $197 per box in carrying cost. Price the clock and the West Coast routing wins by roughly $115 per box. Same spread, opposite answer, depending on whether you count days.
Why seventeen filings happen is worth understanding, because they are not seventeen market moves. A general rate increase is an announcement, not a transaction; it sets the ceiling the carrier defends and discounts from. When seven carriers file the same increase on the same date, they are coordinating the announcement, not the price — each will discount differently to fill its own ships. The underlying pushes are familiar: capacity discipline held since the network redesign, tonnage still absorbed by longer routings, demand front-loaded ahead of tariff decisions, and a peak season that arrives whether or not the filings do. The count matters because each filing resets the anchor for contract negotiations and spot quoting, and seventeen resets in eight months means the anchor is moving monthly.
Who pays depends on contract position. Spot buyers on the transpacific pay the filing stack immediately, at whatever discount the realized rate allows. Contract shippers are insulated until renewal — and then the seventeenth filing is their new baseline. The layered pain sits with mid-size shippers on short contracts: too small for negotiated all-in deals, too regular to sit out the market. The coast choice splits the pain again. East Coast inland cargo can now be routed two ways at nearly the same money, which squeezes the inland rail and drayage legs by competition — good for the shipper, and the reason to re-quote both routings every booking cycle while the spread holds above $2,000.
On timing, the filing was effective 1 September, announced roughly two to four weeks earlier — the standard window. The realized rates tell you how much of it stuck: East Coast plus 1% on the week says the market accepted the level; West Coast plus 11% says that coast was catching up after a softer run, not that a new surge arrived. Watch the next two weekly prints. If the West Coast gives back more than half of the 11% by mid-September, the jump was catch-up, not trend, and the eighteenth filing will be priced against a softer base. That is a two-week question, and it is answerable with public data.
The point the coverage misses: seventeen filings in eight months is a behavioral tell about the sell side, and it cuts both ways. It says carriers believe the rate floor is defensible — they would not file seventeen times into weak demand. It also says the announced number has stopped being news to the buy side; shippers who negotiate off the filing anchor too high, and shippers who ignore the filings entirely miss the floor. The usable signal is not any single filing. It is the gap between announced and realized, filing by filing, which is a number your own quotes already contain. Build that gap table and you know your carrier's real floor — a number that never appears in any announcement.
The counterfactual is October. If post-peak demand softens the way it usually does, the eighteenth filing fails to hold and spot drifts down; shippers who locked twelve-month contracts at $9,144 will watch spot fall underneath them and regret the lock. If instead the tariff calendar delivers another escalation in the fourth quarter, front-loading returns, the next filing holds, and the spot buyers get squeezed. The condition that flips the conclusion is the tariff decision date, not the filing count. One calendar entry decides which side of this trade you should be on, and it is worth finding out what that date is before you sign anything.
↑ Back to the key points