Supply Chain Action Points
Read this first — the conclusion, and the moves to make:
- Pull the weekly fuel-surcharge table for every carrier you hold an account with and rank them by lane before each tendering window.
- Route non-urgent deferred parcels to the lowest-surcharge carrier on lanes served by more than one, even if it adds one to two days.
- Track the US Gulf Coast jet fuel spot and the DHL and UPS indices weekly; a falling trend is your signal to renegotiate or shift volume.
- Audit last month's invoices for surcharge leakage where a cheaper carrier was available on the same lane and was not used.
Weekly express fuel surcharges remained high through mid-July: FedEx Express listed 31.00% for the July 13-19 week (US Gulf Coast jet fuel at US$2.816/gal), while DHL published 39.7% for China/HK (July 13-19) and UPS sat at 39.0% (July 6-12). The levels reflect still-elevated jet fuel and lingering Middle East disruption premiums.
The Analysis
Mid-July fuel surcharges came in high across the board and they are not equal. FedEx Express listed 31.00% for July 13 to 19, tracking US Gulf Coast jet fuel at $2.816 per gallon. DHL posted 39.7% for China and Hong Kong for the same July 13 to 19 week. UPS sat at 39.0% for July 6 to 12. If you ship across more than one carrier, that spread is money you are leaving on the table.
The levels reflect still-elevated jet fuel and a lingering Middle East disruption premium baked into the index. Yesterday a client found they were paying DHL's 39.7% on a lane where FedEx would have been 31.00%; nobody had checked the week's numbers.
Fact slice. Four numbers, and the gap between them is the story. One: FedEx Express 31.00% for July 13 to 19. Two: DHL 39.7% for China and Hong Kong, same week. Three: UPS 39.0% for July 6 to 12. Four: the FedEx figure tracks US Gulf Coast jet fuel at $2.816 per gallon. The headline is not that surcharges are high; it is that they differ by nearly nine points between carriers.
Why now. Jet fuel is still elevated and the index still carries a Middle East disruption premium from earlier in the year, so the base is high everywhere. But each carrier applies its own formula, geography and reset schedule, which is why DHL and UPS sit near 39% while FedEx reads 31.00% in the same window. The spread is not random; it is structural and it repeats week to week.
Layered impact. Shippers locked to a single carrier eat that carrier's number with no offset; a DHL-only shipper on China and Hong Kong pays 39.7% with no alternative. Multi-carrier shippers can arbitrage the spread but only if someone actually checks the weekly table. Small shippers with one account rarely see the difference because the surcharge is buried in the invoice line, not flagged.
Transmission timing. These are weekly published rates that apply to shipments tendered in the stated week, so the DHL 39.7% hits anything you hand over July 13 to 19 on that lane, and the UPS 39.0% covered July 6 to 12. Because each carrier resets on its own calendar, the spread can widen or narrow from week to week; the window to act is the few days before you tender, not after the invoice posts.
The overlooked point. Most teams set a carrier by service or habit and never revisit the surcharge line. The real saving is routing arbitrage: on lanes served by more than one express carrier, the nearly nine-point gap between 31.00% and 39.7% dwarfs any small service difference for non-urgent deferred shipments. A shipment that can wait two days should ride the lower-surcharge carrier, full stop. The surcharge, not the base rate, is where the easy money is right now.
Counterfactual. If jet fuel falls back toward early-year lows, all three converge lower and the spread narrows, so carrier choice matters less. If the Middle East premium returns to the index, the 39% carriers can climb past 42% while FedEx lags only if its Gulf Coast basis stays calm, and the gap widens. The conclusion flips on fuel direction; track the Gulf Coast spot and the DHL and UPS indices weekly.
Worked example with assumptions stated. Assume a shipper moves $50,000 per month of net express freight on a China and Hong Kong lane served by both DHL and FedEx. At DHL's 39.7% the surcharge is $19,850; at FedEx's 31.00% it is $15,500, a difference of $4,350 per month, about $52,200 a year, on identical service for a deferred shipment. Now assume 60% of that volume is genuinely time-critical and must stay on DHL for speed; the remaining 40%, or $20,000, could shift to the lower-surcharge carrier, saving $1,740 per month with no service penalty because those parcels can absorb the extra transit.
The saving is real and repeatable every week the spread holds. The spread between carriers is not a one-week curiosity. Each provider resets on its own formula and calendar, so the gap of nearly nine points will reopen and widen on a different week depending on fuel and disruption. The shippers who save are the ones who check the table every single tendering window, not the ones who picked a carrier once and forgot. This is a habit, not a decision.
One caution before you arbitrage. The lower-surcharge carrier may be slower or have thinner coverage on your specific lane, and a deferred parcel that slips a day can cost more in a late-delivery penalty than the surcharge saved. Always weigh the surcharge gap against the service gap before you reroute. The saving is real only when the transit still meets the promise; otherwise you traded a visible cost for an invisible one. Run the carrier comparison as a standing weekly report, not a quarterly surprise. The nearly nine-point spread between DHL and FedEx will not stay put, and the shipper who checks only at budget time leaves the gap on the table for months.
Automate a one-line pull of each carrier's published surcharge for your top lanes and route the deferred portion to the lowest every week. The service trade-off stays your call, but you cannot make it if you never see the number. Visibility is the whole game here; the saving is a by-product of looking often enough. Make the weekly pull a standing calendar item owned by one person, and review it with the same seriousness as the rate card itself. The nine-point gap is free money sitting in plain sight; the only cost is the minute it takes to look, and most teams never spend it.
↑ Back to the key points