Supply Chain Action Points
Read this first — the conclusion, and the moves to make:
- Do not lock a Q1 fixed rate on Far East to US East Coast until the USEC-to-North-Europe ratio is below 2.5; owner is the procurement lead, and the reference dates are mid-December on a 2%-a-week decline or mid-February on a 1%-a-week decline.
- Budget Q1 US East Coast at roughly $7,729 per FEU, the midpoint of the two closing paths, rather than at today's $11,495 or at a crash-case $7,136; owner is the finance partner, and the variance to either endpoint is about $23,700 a month on 40 boxes.
- Lock Q1 North Europe and Mediterranean volume before the contract season stacks further increases, given weekly moves of 2.5% and 3.2%; owner is the carrier-relations lead, with a target of fixing at or below $3,700 for North Europe and $4,300 for the Mediterranean.
- Track the ratio weekly rather than the rate, and record three numbers every Monday: Far East to US East Coast, Far East to North Europe, and the ratio between them; the trigger to convert from spot to fixed is the ratio below 2.5, not a rate below $9,000.
- Test whether the European increases are real by checking whether they hold for three consecutive weeks; owner is the transportation manager, and if the level reverts by half within a fortnight, treat it as an administered increase and reopen the Q1 number downward.
- Watch blank sailings and booking acceptance on US-bound services to separate a supply-led decline from a demand-led one; the trigger for a deeper budget cut is falling rates with full ships and blankings below 3% of scheduled departures, which means the cargo has gone.
Xeneta's 16 October averages put Far East to US West Coast at $8,296 per FEU, down 0.2% on the week, and US East Coast at $11,495, down 0.1%. North Europe rose 2.5% to $3,568 and the Mediterranean 3.2% to $4,165, while North Europe to US East Coast added 0.8% to $2,946. Analyst Emily Stausboll says US East Coast rates at more than three times North Europe cannot hold, and any narrowing will come mainly from US-bound rates falling rather than Europe rising. Model a closing gap for Q1, not today's spread.
The Analysis
Xeneta's 16 October averages put Far East to US West Coast at $8,296 per FEU, down 0.2% on the week, and Far East to US East Coast at $11,495, down 0.1%. North Europe rose 2.5% to $3,568 and the Mediterranean 3.2% to $4,165. North Europe to US East Coast added 0.8% to $2,946. Emily Stausboll's read is that a US East Coast rate more than three times North Europe cannot hold, and that the narrowing will come mainly from US-bound rates falling rather than European rates rising.
Two checks before the argument. The ratio is 11,495 over 3,568, which is 3.22, so the more-than-three-times in the headline is accurate and even a little modest. The second check is the one that changes how you read the week. Both US legs look flat, down 0.1% and down 0.2%, while both European legs moved, up 2.5% and up 3.2%. Flat on one side and rising on the other reads like a market going nowhere. Compute the ratio for the previous week instead and it is not going nowhere at all. North Europe a week earlier was 3,568 divided by 1.025, call it $3,481. US East Coast a week earlier was 11,495 divided by 0.999, call it $11,506. That ratio is 3.31 against this week's 3.22. The spread compressed 2.5% in seven days. Both legs looked asleep and the thing you actually care about moved two and a half per cent.
That is the whole article in one line: the spread is a ratio, and ratios move faster than the rates inside them.
Take the fact slices on their own before anybody interprets them. The East Coast premium over the West Coast is $3,199 a box, which is 38.6%: the same cargo, the same origin, one canal and a few thousand miles apart, and one of them costs nearly forty per cent more. The Mediterranean sits $597 above North Europe, a 16.7% gap inside Europe itself, and it moved 3.2% this week against North Europe's 2.5%, so the Mediterranean is not just more expensive, it is heating faster. Then the odd one. A box from North Europe to the US East Coast costs $2,946, while a box from the Far East to North Europe costs $3,568. The transatlantic leg is 17.4% cheaper than the leg that brings the box to Europe in the first place. That is not a typo in the data, it is a statement about two markets that barely touch each other, and it is the thread I will come back to.
Why now, and why the two sides are moving in opposite directions. A rate that falls 0.1% a week is not falling, it is drifting, and drift is what you get when supply and demand are roughly balanced and neither side wants to blink. A rate that rises 2.5% in a week is a different animal. Moves of that size on the European trades come from one of two places: capacity pulled off the trade, or a general rate increase being pushed into the water ahead of the contract season. October and November are exactly when carriers try to establish the floor they will negotiate from, and a 2.5% weekly move on North Europe with 3.2% on the Mediterranean has the shape of an administered increase rather than a clearing level.
I cannot prove which from a single week of averages, and neither can anybody else, so hold it as a hypothesis and test it the way you would test any administered price: watch whether it sticks for three consecutive weeks. If it does, it is real. If it reverts by half in a fortnight, it was theatre, and the whole ratio compresses from the top rather than the bottom.
Who this touches, and in which direction, is where the headline does the most damage, because a single sentence about an unsustainable spread quietly tells three groups of importers to do three different things. A US East Coast importer reading it hears a discount coming, and on the analyst's own framing that is correct. A US West Coast importer reading it hears the same, and that is mostly wrong: the West Coast at $8,296 is already 38.6% below the East Coast, and if the compression is an East Coast story, the West Coast does not fall nearly as far, because it is the cheap leg already.
The ratio between them does not have to move at all for the East Coast to do all the adjusting. A North Europe importer reading it hears relief, and that is backwards. Their rate rose 2.5% this week and is being described as the cheap side of an unsustainable gap, which in plain terms means the market is expected to bring them up, not down. A Mediterranean importer is worse placed than any of them: $4,165 and rising fastest in the set. Same headline, three different budgets, and two of the three should be doing the opposite of what the third one does.
One practical line falls straight out of that 38.6% and almost nobody computes it. The East Coast premium over the West Coast is $3,199 a box. If your inland move from a West Coast discharge point to your distribution centre costs less than $3,199 per box all-in, and if the extra transit does not break a delivery promise, the West Coast is the cheaper door and always has been. The reason most importers have never settled this question is that the two numbers sit in different budgets: ocean freight sits with procurement and the inland leg sits with whoever runs the distribution network, and the two are rarely added together in one line.
So the decision gets made on habit, or on the transit time, or on whichever port a carrier's salesperson pushed hardest. If the spread does compress the way the analyst expects, that comparison stops being academic, because the East Coast side of the equation is the one that is about to move. Work the sum out this month, with your own inland number, before the ocean side changes underneath it. It is fifteen minutes of arithmetic and it decides which of the two rates in this note you are actually exposed to.
The Mediterranean deserves a line of its own because it is the one everybody skips. At $4,165 it is 16.7% above North Europe and it moved 3.2% in the measured week against North Europe's 2.5%, so it is both the more expensive European gateway and the faster riser. There is a reason for that and it is not demand: the Mediterranean is a shallower market with fewer services and less spare tonnage to throw at a peak, so the same volume pressure produces a bigger percentage move. If you ship into the Mediterranean, do not model yourself off the North Europe number just because the two are always quoted together. Model off your own lane, and assume the increase you are seeing is stickier than the North Europe one, because the capacity that would have to come back to soften it has fewer places to come from.
The timing of the transmission is the part that catches people out. If you buy spot, a rate move reaches your P&L the week it happens. If you are on an annual contract, it reaches you at renewal, which for most Asia-Europe and trans-Pacific programmes is a spring exercise, three to seven months away. Now put the two clocks together. If the spread closes on the sixteen-week path, it closes in early February. If it takes the slow path, it closes around late May. Either way it closes inside the window in which you are negotiating, not before it. That is the single most useful thing in this note for anyone signing a contract: the number you need is moving fastest in exactly the weeks you have to commit. Which is an argument for a shorter fixed term or a re-opener, and a strong argument against trying to guess the landing point in November.
Here is the part that did not make the headline, and it is the reason I would not build a budget off this note. Three point two times is a ratio. What you pay is a level, and a ratio can arrive at two times by at least two very different roads. Put them side by side, because the difference is not a rounding error.
Take the analyst's own view, that the narrowing comes from the US side. Assume North Europe stays at $3,568 and the East Coast does all the work. For the ratio to reach 2.0 the East Coast has to fall to $7,136, a 37.9% decline from where it is today. At 2% a week that takes roughly 24 weeks, which lands in early April. Now take a two-sided road, where the East Coast falls 2% a week and North Europe rises 1% a week: my assumptions, stated as such. The ratio reaches 2.0 in about 16 weeks, around early February, and it lands near $8,321 on the East Coast and $4,183 into North Europe.
Both of those worlds are the spread having closed to two times. They are not the same invoice. The East Coast importer pays $7,136 in one and $8,321 in the other, a gap of $1,185 a box. The North Europe importer pays $3,568 in one and $4,183 in the other, a gap of $615 a box, and in the second world the European importer is paying more than today for the privilege of the spread having closed. A European buyer who reads unsustainable and hears relief has the sign wrong. On the two-sided path, closing the spread is a $615-a-box increase.
Change the speed and keep the shape, and you land in almost the same place, only later. At 1% a week on the East Coast and 0.5% a week into North Europe the ratio needs about 32 weeks, late May, and lands near $8,333 and $4,185. That near-identical landing is an artifact of holding the two legs in the same proportion, and it is worth knowing, because it tells you what is genuinely uncertain here: not where it lands, but when, and who does the moving. Change the shape instead and everything shifts.
Push the whole adjustment onto Europe, keep the East Coast at $11,495, and North Europe has to reach $5,748, a 61% increase, to get the ratio to two; at 1% a week that is roughly 48 weeks, and it is the worst of all worlds for anyone importing into Europe. So the East Coast landing zone at a 2.0 ratio runs from $7,136 to $11,495. That is a $4,359 range, wider than the entire North Europe rate today, and it is hidden inside a sentence about a ratio.
Now make it a budget. Assume you move 40 FEU a month to the US East Coast and 25 FEU a month to North Europe, and those volumes are an example, so swap in your own. At today's averages that is 40 times 11,495, which is $459,800, plus 25 times 3,568, which is $89,200: about $549,000 a month. In the two-sided world, at $8,321 and $4,183, it is $332,840 plus $104,575, or $437,415, a saving of roughly $111,600 a month. In the US-only world, at $7,136 and $3,568, it is $285,440 plus $89,200, or $374,640, a saving of roughly $174,400 a month. The distance between two versions of the same headline is $62,775 a month, or $753,300 a year. That is what the assumption is worth, and nobody quoted it to you, because what was quoted was a ratio.
Run it the other way for a European importer with no US exposure at all, because that is where the sign flips hardest. Twenty-five boxes a month into North Europe at $3,568 is $89,200. At $4,183 it is $104,575. The spread closing on the two-sided path costs $15,375 a month, or $184,500 a year. Same note, same sentence, opposite direction. If your budget assumed that an unsustainable spread means cheaper boxes, and your boxes happen to be the cheap half of that spread, you have just written a discount into a line that is going up.
And the budgeting error cuts both ways on the US side, which is the practical reason not to pick an endpoint. Build Q1 at today's $11,495 and, if it lands at $8,321, you have over-budgeted by $3,174 a box, about $127,000 a month on 40 boxes. Build it at the crash end, $7,136, and if it only gets to $8,321 you are short $1,185 a box, $47,400 a month. Over-budgeting is a rounding problem that nobody emails you about. Under-budgeting is a meeting. The midpoint of the two worlds is about $7,729, and budgeting there leaves you roughly $23,700 out either way, which is the only version of this where being wrong is survivable.
What would make me wrong, and there are three. The meaningful one is whether the US decline is supply-led or demand-led. If carriers are putting tonnage back onto the trade, the decline is orderly, the sixteen-week path holds, and the landing zone above is about right. If the cargo has stopped moving, the decline does not stop at a tidy ratio, and $7,136 is not a floor. You can tell the two apart without waiting for the rate: watch blank sailings and watch your own booking acceptance. Falling rates with more blank sailings means carriers are defending price with supply, which is the orderly case. Falling rates with full ships and no blankings means the volume has gone, which is the disorderly case, and it overshoots everything in this note.
The second is the structural argument against calling this spread unsustainable at all, and it is stronger than it looks. These are not one market. A box from the Far East to North Europe at $3,568, plus a box from North Europe to the US East Coast at $2,946, comes to $6,514 against $11,495 for going direct. That is a 43% discount sitting on the table and nobody is picking it up, because the routing costs weeks that no supply chain with a delivery date can spare. An arbitrage that large and that unliftable is the cleanest possible evidence that the East Coast premium is defended by transit time rather than by cost. Premiums defended by time do not collapse on a schedule; they collapse when a faster substitute appears, and none is on the horizon. Read that way, 3.2 times is not a bubble, it is the price of a route, and the price of a route can persist well past a quarter.
The third is the weekly print itself. North Europe at plus 2.5% and the Mediterranean at plus 3.2% are one-week numbers, and one week is not a trend. If those are general rate increases being pushed into the contract season, they partially revert, the ratio compresses from the top, and every landing zone above moves down. If they are genuine clearing levels, the European side of this story is firmer than the analyst's framing allows, and the compression has to come almost entirely from the US. Those two readings differ by about $1,185 a box on the East Coast, which is the same number as before, because it is the same question.
So the actions split by lane, which is the whole point of doing this exercise rather than reading the headline. If you ship to the US East Coast, do not lock Q1 yet: buy spot or a short fixed term until the ratio is below 2.5, which is around mid-December on the fast path and around mid-February on the slow one, and use the ratio rather than the rate as your trigger, because the rate alone will look flat for weeks while the thing that determines it is moving. If you ship to North Europe or the Mediterranean, the direction is up and the weekly moves are compounding into the contract season, so lock Q1 now rather than after the increases have stacked. Two importers reading the same note should do opposite things, and the only way to know which one you are is to look at which side of the $3,568 line your boxes sit on.
Half the market is waiting for this spread to close, and roughly half of them are about to discover that closing a spread and getting a discount are two different invoices. Lock the European side before the increases compound; on the US East Coast, wait for the ratio to break 2.5, and do not sign a twelve-month fixed rate before it does.
↑ Back to the key points