Sea-Intelligence's 16 September reading puts Red Sea/Suez routing normalisation at 27% across both directions, up from low single digits in early 2026. The Gemini Cooperation (Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd) moved four more services - AE5, AE11, ME2 and AE12 - back through the canal in September, and back-haul capacity through Suez jumped from 18-26% in August to 25-47% in September as lines prioritise repositioning tonnage to Asia. Head-haul Asia-Europe remains lower at 13-25%, so full normalisation is still distant.
Supply Chain Action Points
Red Sea normalisation has reached 27% - but that average hides a lopsided reality that matters directly to importers and exporters. Carriers are routing far more back-haul (Europe-to-Asia) capacity through Suez than head-haul (Asia-to-Europe), because they want their empty boxes back to Asia fast. For a shipper, this means the 'return to normal' is real for equipment positioning but only partial for transit times and rates on your Asia-Europe lane.
The 27% figure from Sea-Intelligence is the headline, but the detail is what you plan against. Back-haul capacity through Suez jumped from 18-26% in August to 25-47% in September, while head-haul Asia-Europe sat at only 13-25%. Translation: carriers are prioritising getting empty containers back to Asia to relieve equipment shortages at origin ports - a real benefit if you are an exporter staring at a box shortage - but they are not yet restoring the Asia-to-Europe sailings that would shorten your transit or cut your rate. The Gemini Cooperation (Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd) moving AE5, AE11, ME2 and AE12 back through the canal is meaningful, yet every carrier statement still makes the routing conditional on security. This is a calculated, reversible bet, not a return to normal.
For an exporter, the equipment-angle is the bright side. Longer Cape-of-Good-Hope routings since the crisis have trapped containers at sea and created shortages at Chinese load ports, especially in peak season. More boxes repositioning via the shorter Suez back-haul helps refill Asian depots, which should ease the 3-5 day equipment delays seen at peak. If you have been struggling to get boxes, the next few weeks may loosen that constraint - but do not assume it; keep flexible on container type (standard versus high-cube) and book early.
For an importer, manage expectations on transit and cost. Asia-Europe head-haul rates have come down from their crisis peak (Shanghai-Rotterdam around USD 3,485, Shanghai-Genoa around USD 3,835 per 40ft) precisely because more effective capacity is returning - yet full normalisation is distant. A booking today should still carry Cape-of-Good-Hope buffers in the plan, because a single security incident can flip a service back to the long route overnight, adding 10-14 days. If your goods are time-critical, the Cape buffer is the price of certainty; if they are not, the softer rate is the reward for tolerating the risk.
The Mediterranean is further along in normalisation than North Europe - plan around that asymmetry. Prefer Mediterranean-bound routing where the choice exists, but confirm in writing whether your booked service uses Suez or the Cape, because it changes both transit time and war-risk premium. Maintain a separate war-risk insurance endorsement (0.5-1.0% of cargo value) for Red Sea-transiting cargo; do not let it ride inside a generic policy that may exclude the corridor.
The underlying truth: this is a reversible bet by the carriers. A single serious incident at Bab el-Mandeb and the back-haul percentage falls as fast as it rose. Build your plan for the lane you actually sail this week, and keep the contingency current - the 'normal' you book against may not be the 'normal' your cargo meets at sea.
Lean into the asymmetry between corridors when you plan. The Mediterranean is further along in normalisation than North Europe, so where the choice exists, prefer Mediterranean-bound routing and confirm in writing whether your booked service uses Suez or the Cape - because that single fact changes both your transit time and your war-risk premium. For cargo that cannot tolerate a 10-14 day surprise, the Cape buffer is the price of certainty and you should bake it into every Asia-Europe plan, not add it as an afterthought when an incident hits. On insurance, do not assume a generic policy covers the corridor; maintain a separate war-risk endorsement at 0.5-1.0% of cargo value and name the specific routing, because a blanket exclusion can void the cover exactly when you need it. Treat the 27% normalisation as reversible: the carriers' own statements make the routing conditional on security, so rebuild the contingency every time you book rather than once a quarter. The 'normal' you commit against this week may not be the 'normal' your cargo meets at sea, and the gap between the two is precisely the risk you are paid to manage.
The equipment relief also has a timing edge worth exploiting. Because carriers are prioritising empty repositioning, the box shortage that plagued Asian load ports at peak is easing fastest on the trades they serve first. If you have been paying premium rates for guaranteed equipment, re-quote now - the softening may already be visible in your forwarder's depot stock report even if it has not reached your rate card. Ask for availability by container type this week. A 3-5 day equipment delay became a booked-aircraft emergency for many exporters last peak; the repositioning now is the window to retire that risk before Q4 volumes arrive.
- Expect Asian box availability to improve as Suez back-haul repositions empties, but stay flexible on container type and book early.
- Keep Cape-of-Good-Hope buffers in Asia-Europe plans; a single incident can flip a service back to the long route overnight (+10-14 days).
- Prefer Mediterranean-bound routing over North Europe where possible - normalisation is furthest along there.
- Confirm in writing whether your booked service uses Suez or the Cape; it changes both transit time and war-risk premium.
- Maintain a separate war-risk insurance endorsement (0.5-1.0% of cargo value) for Red Sea-transiting cargo.
- Treat the 27% normalisation as reversible; rebuild the contingency every time you book, not once a quarter.