Supply Chain Action Points
Read this first — the conclusion, and the moves to make:
- Before 16 August, reconcile one live offer against your index reference line by line: list every surcharge, terminal handling charge and peak season add-on in each, and price the same door-to-door scope on both.
- Stop using the composite as the reference for a single lane; if a contract must reference an index, reference the lane assessment at $5,630 and write the inclusions into the clause.
- Re-price any index-minus-X clause against a $5,000 clearing level; at a $5,480 equivalent you are about 9.6% over market, which on 100 FEU a month is roughly $48,000.
- Hold 20% of August and September Asia-Europe volume uncommitted so the sub-$5,000 offers can be tested, and commit the balance before the 16 August filing.
- Watch the ten days before 16 August for a blank sailing covering the second half of the month; if none is announced, assume the increase will not hold and buy the reset on the way down.
Drewry's World Container Index composite slipped to $4,255 per 40ft box in late July, with Shanghai-Genoa down 6% to $5,630 per FEU and forwarders reporting Asia-Europe offers below $5,000. MSC will apply revised South Asia to Antwerp and Valencia tariffs from August 16, while carriers keep managing capacity through blank sailings.
The Analysis
Drewry's composite came in at $4,255 per FEU in late July. Shanghai to Genoa fell 6% to $5,630. Forwarders are reporting Asia-Europe offers below $5,000. MSC files revised South Asia to Antwerp and Valencia tariffs from 16 August. Carriers keep managing capacity with blank sailings.
Four numbers and one date, and two of those numbers disagree by 11%. That disagreement is worth more than the 6%.
$4,255 is a basket. $5,630 is a lane. The basket sits 24.4% under the lane, which tells you something cheaper is dragging it down. If your cargo is Shanghai to Genoa, the composite is not your index; it is a different product with a similar name. Contracts get signed on the composite because the composite is the number in the press release, then the lane does something the basket does not, and both sides discover the clause was never about their cargo.
Now the gap. $5,630 against an offer below $5,000 is at least $630, or 11.2%, and probably more, because "below $5,000" is a phrase rather than a price. Three things produce an 11% gap: different inclusions, different dates, different volumes. Inclusions are the big one. An assessed rate carries a defined set of surcharges; an offer carries whatever the forwarder decided to put in the all-in. The first question about a sub-$5,000 offer is not whether it is real. It is what is not in it. A number 11% under the assessment is not a market price yet; it is a negotiation position with a date on it, and the date is the part people forget to ask about.
MSC's 16 August filing is South Asia to Antwerp and Valencia. Shanghai is not South Asia. Genoa is neither Antwerp nor Valencia. That filing says nothing about the lane that fell 6%, and using it as a floor for Shanghai to Genoa is a category error. What it does say is more interesting: a carrier is filing upward on a secondary origin at the same moment the mainline lane is softening. That is a portfolio decision. Capacity is being pointed at the origin where the carrier thinks it has leverage and away from the one where it does not.
A rate increase announced into softening demand has a short life. It lands, it is partly absorbed, and the first blank sailing tells you how much stuck. The letter is not the signal; the blank sailing is. Announcements of that kind usually come two to three weeks before the voyage they affect, which puts the window for the 16 August filing in the ten days ahead of it. A blank sailing covering the second half of August means the increase has carrier conviction behind it. The 6% is the only figure in the story that is already history. Silence means the market absorbs the letter and hands it back inside a month.
The thing not in the coverage is that these are two different markets reported as one. The index leg is the Far East. The filing is South Asia. The offer is whatever origin the forwarder bought. "Asia-Europe" is doing a lot of work in that sentence, and if your sourcing has moved toward the subcontinent, the softening index is not your market and the 16 August filing is. That is what a route-specific tariff does in a basket-index world: your index and your lane can sit on different continents and both be called Asia.
Who this lands on. A small shipper has no index, only an offer with a validity of a week or two and a volume condition; he is already at the sub-$5,000 level and the index is irrelevant to him. A mid-size shipper has an index-linked contract with a quarterly reset, sold to him as protection and now trading as a penalty. A large shipper has a minimum quantity commitment and watches neither number. The person a falling market hurts is the one who bought protection from a rising one.
Assume 100 FEU a month on Asia-Europe, my assumption, and take the lane at $5,630 against the offer at $5,000. That is $630 a box, $63,000 a month, $756,000 a year. Then the clause. If the contract reads index minus $150, you pay $5,480 while the market clears at $5,000, which is 9.6% over, or $48,000 a month on 100 boxes. The clause was meant to transfer risk. In a market falling 6% a quarter it transfers risk in one direction, and that direction is not the one you wanted.
If you had left 20% of the volume uncommitted, you would be buying at $5,000 today and setting the next reset off a lower base. If the increase does stick and spreads from South Asia to the Far East, the sub-$5,000 offers vanish within two to three weeks and the uncommitted volume becomes the expensive volume. That is the risk of waiting, and it is a timing risk rather than a price risk. The composite at $4,255 does not settle it, because the composite is a lagging average of assessments and the offers are what is clearing now.
The trap is treating an index as a price and an offer as a rate. Neither is. An index is an average, and an average is a place where nobody actually ships. Lock the lane and the date, not the basket, and do it before 16 August if your origin is South Asia, after it if your origin is Shanghai, because that is when you find out whether the letter had any conviction behind it.
↑ Back to the key points