← Back to Supply Chain Review Ocean Freight

Drewry WCI holds at $4,476 for second week as transpacific firms, Asia-Europe eases

Source: Drewry / Inside Logistics · 2026-09-10 · 15 min read
中文
Summary

Drewry's 10 September WCI held at $4,476/FEU, up just $11 on the week but 119% year-on-year. Transpacific strengthened: Shanghai-Los Angeles $7,352 (+2%, +175% YoY) and Shanghai-New York $9,726 (+1%, +160% YoY). Asia-Europe weakened as Suez returns: Shanghai-Rotterdam $3,997 (-2%) and Shanghai-Genoa $4,216 (-3%). Shanghai's wait eased from 94 to 64 hours.

The Analysis

Drewry's World Container Index held at $4,476 per FEU on 10 September, up just $11 on the week and still 119% above a year ago. The average conceals two markets moving in opposite directions. Transpacific firmed: Shanghai to Los Angeles at $7,352, up 2% on the week and 175% on the year, and Shanghai to New York at $9,726, up 1% and 160%. Asia to Europe weakened as the Suez return added capacity: Shanghai to Rotterdam at $3,997, down 2%, and Shanghai to Genoa at $4,216, down 3%.

Shanghai's vessel wait eased from 94 hours to 64, which is real relief on the berth. Against that, carriers have signalled blank sailings rising from 7 to 8 next week on the Asia-Europe lane, which tells you the flat index is being held up rather than simply arriving. A flat week after a long climb is the moment when contract and spot decisions get made badly, because it looks like a pause and behaves like a platform.

Every group below works from the same figures: $4,476 per FEU on the WCI, $7,352 to Los Angeles, $9,726 to New York, $3,997 to Rotterdam, $4,216 to Genoa, a Shanghai wait down from 94 to 64 hours, and blank sailings rising from 7 to 8. Assumptions are stated wherever a calculation is used.

For Exporters

  • By 22 September, requote every open offer lane by lane and cut validity to 14 days with the FAK or named-account basis stated
  • Size it: 50 West Coast boxes at $7,352 and 20 Rotterdam boxes at $3,997 is $447,540 a month, about $304,000 a month more than a year ago at an index 119% lower
  • Put a bunker and peak-season clause with a written trigger and 7 days' notice into every CIF and DDP offer
  • Split the booking calendar by 30 September: book the US early and long, and hold a higher spot share on Asia-Europe while keeping minimum space
  • Price the validity window: a 3% move in 14 days is $221 a box, or $11,050 on 50 boxes
  • Never quote one US rate when the two coasts differ by $2,374 a box

Two weeks flat at $4,476 per FEU is not a signal to wait. It is the first window in months when a rate can be quoted on a number you can defend. Look at the components: Shanghai to Los Angeles is $7,352, up 175% on the year; Shanghai to New York is $9,726, up 160%; Shanghai to Rotterdam is $3,997 and falling; Genoa is $4,216 and down 3%. A single US rate on your offer sheet is now wrong on both coasts, and a single Europe rate is wrong in both directions.

Assumptions: 50 FEU a month to the West Coast and 20 to Rotterdam, at $7,352 and $3,997. That is $367,600 a month on the US lane and $79,940 on Europe, $447,540 a month. A year ago, with the index 119% lower, the same average would be about $2,043 a FEU: on the same 70 boxes that is roughly $143,000 a month, so you are carrying about $304,000 a month more freight cost than a year ago. Now price the validity window: a 3% move on the US lane inside 14 days is $221 a box, or $11,050 across 50 boxes. That is what a 30-day offer costs you when the market moves once.

By 22 September, requote every open offer lane by lane and cut validity to 14 days, with the basis stated as FAK or named account. Put a bunker and peak-season clause into every CIF and DDP offer, with a written trigger and 7 days' notice. By 30 September, split your booking calendar so the Europe volume is booked short and the US volume is booked early and long: Asia-Europe is falling, and a higher spot share there captures the slide, while a carrier adding a blank sailing is exactly why you still hold minimum space on it. Keep origin and shipping documents aligned with the declared lane, because a re-routed box still clears on origin evidence.

Alternatives and the trade-offs. Converting Europe-bound cargo from contract to spot captures the fall and costs you space certainty on a lane where blank sailings are being added. Holding a European and a US inventory position at the same stock level protects service and doubles the working capital. Pushing volume onto an earlier sailing to escape a rate rise simply moves the cost into inventory. The traps: quoting one US rate when the coasts differ by $2,374; assuming a flat index means a flat contract; and writing an evergreen clause that resets at the index with no cap and no floor, which passes the next spike straight through to you.

For Cross-Border E-commerce

  • By 25 September, rebuild landed cost per SKU at the live rate and flag every SKU where unit freight moved more than $1.50
  • Quantify it: $7,352 a container against a year-ago $2,673 is $2.45 versus $0.89 a unit, a $1.56 gap and $93,600 a month at 60,000 units
  • Lock three months of space: avoiding an 8% peak rise on 20 containers a month at $7,352 is $11,763 a month
  • By 10 October, cut the winter buy on any SKU below 15% contribution margin and move hero SKUs off spot
  • Keep the European position where goods are already sourced there, with Rotterdam at $3,997 and falling
  • Do not set retail price on a year-ago landed cost or read a flat index as a rate cut

The index is flat; your landed cost is not. Shanghai to Los Angeles is $7,352 per FEU, up 175% on the year, and New York is $9,726, up 160%. Asia-Europe runs the other way, with Rotterdam at $3,997 and Genoa at $4,216, both falling on the week while the carriers add a blank sailing. For an importer whose margin is per unit, the only number that matters is freight per unit, and at $7,352 a container it is not the number it was a year ago.

Assumptions: 3,000 units a container, monthly sales of 60,000 units so 20 containers a month, and a Los Angeles rate of $7,352 against a year-ago rate of roughly $2,673 implied by the 175% rise. Freight per unit is $2.45 today and $0.89 a year ago, a gap of $1.56 a unit, or $93,600 a month and $1.12m a year at 60,000 units. Now test the space decision: locking three months of space at the current rate avoids an 8% peak-season rise, which on 20 containers a month at $7,352 is $11,763 a month. The space lock is worth more than the argument about the rate.

By 25 September, rebuild landed cost per SKU at the live lane rate and flag every SKU where the unit freight moved more than $1.50. By 10 October, cut the winter buy on any SKU under 15% contribution margin at the current rate, and move the hero SKUs from spot onto a locked space agreement. By 31 October, renegotiate last-mile and returns cost with your 3PL on the assumption that the West Coast flow is primary. Where you already hold European inventory, keep it: Asia-Europe is easing, and $3,997 into Rotterdam is the cheapest lane named here, which is a real reason to hold the European position rather than consolidate everything onto the US.

Alternatives. Pulling volume to Europe only works for goods already sourced there, and $3,997 against $7,352 funds a genuine decision. Locking space rather than rate protects the flow and leaves the rate exposed, which is the right way round when the index is 119% above a year and carriers are managing capacity down. Air covers a stockout, not a $1.56 unit gap, and at current rates it does not pay even on hero SKUs. The traps: setting retail price on last year's landed cost; reading a flat index week as a rate cut; and leaving the tail of the range on spot while locking space only for the top sellers, so the products with the thinnest margin carry the highest rate risk.

For Manufacturing Plants

  • By 22 September, run the build cost at the live lane rates, $7,352 and $9,726 for the US and $3,997 and $4,216 for Europe
  • Secure space rather than rate by 30 September on parts that cannot fly, since blank sailings rise from 7 to 8 next week
  • Raise safety stock on critical-path parts from 7 to 12 days only on the Europe lane, where capacity is being withdrawn
  • Weigh it: the 94-to-64-hour berth gain is about $205 of capital on 20 boxes, while moving off the Europe lane costs $3,355 a container
  • By 15 October, pull long-lead spares and equipment parts to a 90-day horizon and qualify one alternative port pair per critical part
  • Do not negotiate rate when the exposure is capacity, and never read a flat index as a stable lane

Two flat weeks at $4,476 per FEU is the moment to fix inbound routing, not to relax. Shanghai to Los Angeles at $7,352 and New York at $9,726 are firming, while Rotterdam at $3,997 and Genoa at $4,216 are easing. Shanghai's berth wait has come down from 94 hours to 64. For a plant importing on a fixed cycle, the relevant change is not the average: it is the $2,374 a container between the two US coasts and the falling cost of anything sourced through Europe.

Assumptions: 30 inbound containers a month, 20 through the US West Coast at $7,352 and 10 through Rotterdam at $3,997, so $147,040 and $39,970, or $187,010 a month. Index-linked rates 119% above a year ago mean a plant importing $6m of material a year is carrying roughly $3.3m more in freight than a year ago, and that number is already inside the standard cost of every part. The berth improvement, 94 hours to 64, is worth about $205 of capital on those 20 boxes: real, but not the point. The point is that blank sailings rise from 7 to 8 next week on the lane your Europe parts depend on.

By 22 September, put the live lane rate into the standard cost of every imported part and re-run the build cost at $7,352 and $9,726 for the US lanes and at $3,997 and $4,216 for Europe. By 30 September, secure space rather than rate on the parts that cannot be air-freighted, because blank sailings rising from 7 to 8 next week is a capacity event and a rate contract does not cover it. Raise safety stock on critical-path parts from 7 days to 12 only where the Europe lane is named, since that is the lane losing sailings. By 15 October, pull long-lead spares and equipment parts to a 90-day horizon and qualify one alternative port pair per critical part, so a blank sailing is a rebooking rather than a line stop.

Alternatives, ranked. Booking space early on the Europe lane costs a rate that is still falling, but it protects a part number on a lane where sailings are being pulled. Moving parts off the Europe lane onto the US West Coast flow avoids that exposure and costs $3,355 more a container. Air covers a coverage gap on a critical part and does not scale to a monthly flow. The traps: negotiating rate when the risk is capacity; treating a flat index week as a stable market when a carrier has just announced an extra blank sailing; and leaving a berth wait that fell 30 hours out of the schedule while it is genuinely there.

For Brand Owners

  • By 30 September, price by region: the US on the $7,352 lane and Europe on the $3,997 lane, not one national or global price
  • Quantify it: $1.56 a unit on 120,000 units is $187,200 a month, and a 2% price rise nets about $142,848 after a 2.4% volume loss at 1.2 elasticity
  • Publish an annual lane-linked price adjustment clause by 15 October with a stated trigger
  • Set written channel and region inventory priority, since the same box costs $3,355 more into the US West Coast than into Rotterdam
  • From 1 November, hold the US promotional calendar flat until the Q1 rate picture is visible
  • Do not price on a year-ago landed cost or run one global price across two lanes moving in opposite directions

A flat index at $4,476, with Los Angeles at $7,352 and New York at $9,726, is a gross-margin event you can finally measure. Freight per unit has moved from $0.89 to $2.45 on a 3,000-unit container in a year, and unlike a spike that reverses within a month, a 175% year-on-year move changes what the price itself has to be. Asia-Europe runs the other way, with Rotterdam at $3,997 and Genoa at $4,216, so a brand with both flows is being paid differently in each market for the same product.

Assumptions: a $120 average order value, 120,000 units a month equal to 40 containers, 3,000 units a container, and freight at $2.45 a unit against $0.89 a year ago. The $1.56 a unit is 1.3% of the average order value, $187,200 a month across the range. Now test a 2% price move: at $122.40 and a price elasticity of 1.2, volume falls 2.4% to 117,120 units, the higher price brings in $281,088 and the lost volume costs $138,240 of gross profit at $48 a unit, a net gain of about $142,848 a month. That covers roughly three quarters of the freight move, and the arithmetic holds until elasticity reaches about 2.4.

By 30 September, price by region rather than nationally: the US on the $7,352 lane, Europe on the $3,997 lane, because the same product lands at a cost that differs by $3,355. By 15 October, publish an annual price adjustment tied to the lane rate, with a stated trigger, so a 175% year-on-year move is a clause rather than a negotiation. Set the channel and region inventory priority in writing. From 1 November, hold the promotional calendar flat in the US until the Q1 rate picture is visible, because a discount on the highest-cost lane is a direct margin transfer.

Alternatives. Absorbing the $1.56 a unit on the two hero SKUs and repricing the tail protects volume where it matters. Shifting the assortment toward Europe-sourced goods takes advantage of a $3,997 lane, but only if the supply is genuinely there. Holding price and cutting service level is the one option that damages the brand, and it is the one most often chosen by default. The traps: pricing on a year-ago landed cost; running one global price when the same container costs $3,355 more into the US West Coast than into Rotterdam; and letting a flat index week delay a price decision the year-on-year number has already made.

For Procurement Teams

  • By 30 September, tender the transpacific and Asia-Europe lanes separately: 75% to 80% cover on the US and 40% to 50% on Europe
  • Quantify the cover: 360 West Coast boxes at $1,103 saved is $397,080 a year, plus 240 Europe boxes at $599 is $143,760
  • Stress the downside: a 20% fall to $5,882 costs $367 a box on the West Coast, or $132,120 a year, which is why Europe cover stays low
  • Write the escalator out: 80% of the WCI lane move, plus or minus 10% dead band, cap 25%, floor 15%, 30 days' notice, quarterly
  • By 15 October, add clauses covering blank sailings, Suez re-routing and port congestion with a defined schedule remedy
  • Tender in November for January, and never put two lanes moving in opposite directions into one index-linked contract

The question procurement has to answer is whether a flat index week is a signing window or a waiting window, and the answer differs by lane. The WCI held at $4,476, up $11, still 119% above the year. Transpacific firmed: Los Angeles $7,352, New York $9,726. Asia-Europe eased: Rotterdam $3,997, Genoa $4,216. Carriers are lifting blank sailings from 7 to 8 next week on the Europe lane to stop the slide, and Shanghai's berth wait fell from 94 to 64 hours. Three facts decide it: carriers are defending the Pacific, capacity is returning to Europe, and the Suez return is what is pressing Asia-Europe down.

Assumptions: 600 FEU a year, 360 to the US West Coast and 240 to Europe, contracted at 85% of spot. Los Angeles at $7,352 gives a contract rate of $6,249, saving $1,103 a box, $397,080 a year on 360 boxes. Rotterdam at $3,997 gives $3,398, saving $599 a box, $143,760 a year on 240. Total $540,840 a year. Now stress it: if the index falls 15% in Q4, the West Coast contract and spot both sit at $6,249 and the cover earns nothing; at a 20% fall to $5,882 the contract costs $367 a box, $132,120 a year across 360 boxes. Cover the Pacific because carriers are pulling capacity; do not cover Europe, because the slide is already under way.

By 30 September, tender the two lanes separately and set different cover: 75% to 80% contracted on the transpacific, 40% to 50% on Asia-Europe, with the balance on spot to catch the fall. Replace a fixed annual rate with an index-linked escalator tied to the published WCI lane figure, reviewed quarterly, with a stated dead band, a cap and a floor, and a 30-day notice period. By 15 October, write terms covering blank sailings, Suez re-routing and port congestion, so a withdrawal of capacity is a schedule event with a defined remedy rather than a commercial dispute. Fix the negotiation calendar now: tender in November for January, not in February.

Alternatives, stated as a formula you can put in the contract: quarterly adjustment equal to 80% of the WCI lane move, a plus or minus 10% dead band, a cap at plus 25%, a floor at minus 15%, effective on the first day of the quarter after 30 days' written notice. The unhedged alternative is to stay on spot and accept the asymmetry, because this week's flat reading arrived with a carrier adding a blank sailing, which means the next move on the Europe lane reflects capacity management rather than demand. The traps: signing one index-linked contract covering both lanes when they are moving in opposite directions; a clause that resets at the index with no cap and no floor; and treating a two-week flat index as a signal to stop covering volume at all.

↑ Back to the key points